Article 105 of Indian Constitution

Article 105 of Indian Constitution

We will explore the significance of Article 105 of the Indian Constitution. It guarantees freedom of speech in Parliament. It also provides immunity from court proceedings for statements made or votes given in Parliament. This is a key aspect of parliamentary rights.

The Indian Constitution was adopted in 1950. It is the foundation of the country’s legal framework. Article 105 is a vital component of it. It shapes the parliamentary rights and immunities granted to members of Parliament.

The article 105 of indian constitution plays a vital role in ensuring the smooth functioning of the Indian parliamentary system. Understanding its provisions is essential for grasping the concept of parliamentary rights and the indian constitution. As we dive into the details of Article 105, we will examine how it influences the functioning of the Indian Parliament. We will also look at the implications it has on the indian constitution and parliamentary rights.

As we discuss the article 105 of indian constitution and its impact on parliamentary rights, we will also touch upon the historical background and significance of this article. This sets the stage for further exploration of the indian constitution and its provisions. The indian constitution has undergone several amendments, including the 44th Amendment Act of 1978. This act maintained the privileges outlined in Article 105, further solidifying the importance of parliamentary rights.

Key Takeaways

  • Article 105 of the Indian Constitution guarantees freedom of speech in Parliament.
  • Members of Parliament enjoy immunity from court proceedings for statements made or votes given in Parliament.
  • The article 105 of indian constitution is a key aspect of parliamentary rights and the indian constitution.
  • The Indian Constitution, adopted in 1950, is the foundation of the country’s legal framework.
  • Understanding Article 105 is essential for grasping the concept of parliamentary rights and the indian constitution.
  • The provisions of Article 105 have been influenced by the Government of India Act of 1935.

Understanding Article 105 of Indian Constitution

Exploring Article 105 reveals the key role of parliamentary immunities in Parliament’s smooth operation. The constitutional framework of India ensures members of Parliament have freedom of speech in parliament. This freedom lets them share their views without fear of backlash.

Article 105 highlights the significance of parliamentary immunities in Parliament’s independence. Members are protected from legal actions for statements made during their duties. They also can’t be arrested during a session or for 40 days before and after.

Some key aspects of Article 105 include:

  • Freedom of speech and expression for members of Parliament
  • Immunity from legal proceedings for speeches or votes made within the House
  • Right to publish parliamentary proceedings, ensuring transparency in legislative actions

 

parliamentary immunities

 

The constitutional framework of India also outlines the limitations of parliamentary immunities. Members can face legal action for crimes outside the House. They can also be arrested for criminal cases or when a warrant is issued against them.

Historical Background of Parliamentary Privileges

The idea of parliamentary privileges has grown over time. The Supreme Court has played a big role in understanding Article 105. The Court has made it clear that parliamentary immunities don’t mean lawmakers are above the law. Members of Parliament can be arrested like anyone else, even when Parliament is in session.

Freedom of Speech in Parliament

The Indian Parliament is based on the freedom of speech, a key right in democracies. This right is protected by Article 105 of the Indian Constitution. It ensures that Parliament members can’t be sued for what they say or vote on in Parliament or its committees.

Freedom of speech in Parliament is vital for democracy. It lets members debate important issues without fear of being sued. This right is key for the integrity and independence of the legislative process.

Some important points about freedom of speech in the Indian Parliament include:

  • Freedom from arrest in civil cases during attendance at the House and while commuting to and from it
  • Immunity from legal proceedings for speeches or votes in the House
  • Right to publish parliamentary proceedings, promoting transparency

These rules help keep the democratic principles of the Indian Constitution alive. They ensure Parliament members can do their jobs well. The freedom of speech in Parliament is a key part of the Indian Parliament’s work, and it’s vital for India’s democracy.

freedom of speech

In conclusion, freedom of speech in the Indian Parliament is a critical part of the country’s democracy. It’s protected by Article 105 of the Indian Constitution. This right lets Parliament members debate and discuss without fear, which is key for the legislative process and the Parliament’s health.

Parliamentary Privileges and Immunities

We will now explore the details of parliamentary privileges and immunities. This includes civil and criminal immunity and how long these protections last. Members of Parliament in India have immunity from legal action for statements or actions done during their duties.

These privileges only apply when they are actively serving. They end once they leave office. Some important points about these privileges are:

  • Civil immunity provisions, which protect members from civil liability for their actions during parliamentary sessions
  • Criminal immunity provisions, which protect members from criminal liability for their actions during parliamentary sessions
  • Freedom of speech and expression, as guaranteed under Article 105(1) of the Indian Constitution

These rules help members of Parliament do their jobs without fear of legal trouble. But, it’s important to remember that these privileges are not complete. They have some limits and rules.

For example, members have freedom of speech, but it’s not without limits. To use these privileges, members must follow the Constitution and parliamentary rules, as mentioned in Article 118.

PrivilegeDescription
Civil ImmunityProtection from civil liability for actions during parliamentary sessions
Criminal ImmunityProtection from criminal liability for actions during parliamentary sessions
Freedom of SpeechGuaranteed under Article 105(1) of the Indian Constitution

Limitations and Restrictions

Parliamentary privileges are key for Parliament’s work. But, there are limits and rules that apply. The limitations of parliamentary privileges come from the Constitution and Parliament’s rules. For example, the freedom to speak in Parliament is limited by these rules.

The restrictions on freedom of speech help keep things balanced. They make sure members of Parliament act responsibly. This way, Parliament’s work is fair and open. Some important limits include:

  • Parliamentary privileges are not absolute and are subject to the provisions of the Constitution and the rules and standing orders regulating the procedure of Parliament.
  • The freedom of speech in Parliament is not unlimited and is subject to certain restrictions, such as the prohibition on discussing certain topics or using certain language.
  • Members of Parliament are not immune from prosecution for certain offenses, such as bribery or corruption.

In summary, limits on parliamentary privileges are vital. They keep the balance between members’ rights and accountability. Knowing these limits helps us use parliamentary privileges wisely for the country’s good.

Notable Supreme Court Judgments

The Supreme Court of India has played a big role in understanding Article 105. This has shaped how we see and use parliamentary privileges. The supreme court judgments on Article 105 show how key judicial interpretation is.

In the Sita Soren v. Union of India case, the Supreme Court made a big decision. They said lawmakers can’t hide behind parliamentary immunity in bribery cases. This ruling has big effects on how we see article 105 interpretation and parliamentary privileges.

Landmark Cases Interpreting Article 105

Some important points from these cases are:

  • The Supreme Court has made it clear that legislative privileges must follow the Constitution.
  • The Court has said that the term “in respect of” can’t be used to cover bribery cases.
  • Bribery is seen as complete when the bribe is accepted, not by what happens later.

Evolution of Judicial Interpretation

The way the Supreme Court has interpreted judicial interpretation has changed a lot. The Court’s decisions have been key in understanding Article 105. They’ve made it clear what parliamentary privileges are and what they’re not. This ensures the democratic process stays strong.

CaseYearKey Points
Sita Soren v. Union of India2024Lawmakers are not protected by parliamentary immunity in bribery cases.
P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State1998Granted immunity under Article 105(2) for lawmakers receiving bribes to vote.

Comparison with Other Democracies

When we look at parliamentary privileges in India, comparing them with other democracies is key. The British model, which many of India’s laws are based on, is a good starting point. By exploring global practices, we can learn what works well and what might need change.

Comparing parliamentary privileges across countries shows both commonalities and differences. For example, the British model shields MPs from legal actions over their speeches or votes. India’s Article 105(2) does the same for its MPs.

Some key features of parliamentary privileges worldwide include:

  • Freedom of speech and immunity from legal actions
  • Protection from arrest in civil cases during session times and for a period before and after
  • Exemption from serving as jurors while in office

By studying global practices and comparing them, we can see what’s working in India and what’s not. This helps us find ways to make India’s democracy stronger.

CountryParliamentary Privileges
IndiaFreedom of speech, immunity from civil and criminal proceedings
United KingdomImmunity from legal proceedings related to statements made or votes cast in parliament
United StatesProtection from arrest in civil cases during session times and for a specified period before and after the session

Conclusion

Article 105 of the Indian Constitution is key in protecting lawmakers’ rights and freedoms. It lets them speak freely and vote without fear of legal trouble. This is important for the Parliament to work well.

But, these protections have limits. They must not harm the need for openness and fairness in government. The Supreme Court has said these rights don’t override basic freedoms. It also stresses the importance of following the law, even for lawmakers.

Looking ahead, India must find a good balance. It should keep the Parliament strong but also prevent misuse of power. By doing this, India can keep its Parliament as a place of open debate. Here, lawmakers’ rights are respected, and the country’s needs are met.

FAQ

What is Article 105 of the Indian Constitution?

Article 105 of the Indian Constitution is key. It gives rights and protections to members of Parliament. This helps the legislative body work well by keeping their speech and actions safe.

What is the historical background and significance of Article 105?

Article 105 has its roots in the 1950 Indian Constitution. It comes from the British model, aiming to keep the Indian Parliament independent and effective. It protects MPs’ rights and immunities, letting them work without fear of legal trouble.

How does Article 105 protect the freedom of speech in Parliament?

Article 105 defends the right to free speech in Parliament. It lets MPs speak freely, without fear of legal action. This is key for democracy. But, it also ensures order in Parliament.

What are the parliamentary privileges and immunities provided under Article 105?

Article 105 gives MPs many protections. These include immunity from legal action for their actions and words in Parliament. This lets them do their jobs without interference.

Are there any limitations or restrictions on the parliamentary privileges under Article 105?

Yes, Article 105 has limits and restrictions. These are set by the Constitution and court decisions. They balance MPs’ rights with the need for accountability.

How have the Supreme Court’s interpretations of Article 105 influenced the understanding and application of parliamentary privileges?

The Supreme Court of India has shaped Article 105 through important decisions. These rulings have clarified what privileges MPs have and their limits. They’ve also helped the democratic process.

How does the Indian model of parliamentary privileges compare to other democracies?

Comparing India’s model to others, like the British, is important. This shows similarities and differences. It also points out areas where India might need to change its approach.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top