This article on “Medical College Reservation in Context with Case Law Ajay Kumar Singh Vs. State Of Bihar Under Article 15″ is written by Shifali, a student of BA LLB 2ND year in lovely professional university, Phagwara (Punjab). This article deals with reservations for backward classes in medical colleges. Introduction Article 15 in The Constitution […]
In our country, the judiciary is the main cornerstone of democracy, assisting in the efficient operation of democracy. The judiciary is dominated by judges. It is necessary for judges to be efficient in order for the judiciary to be successful. There are many great judges in our country who have brought about various changes through
India is a country that believes in the reformative theory of law. The death penalty is the highest punishment given to anyone convicted. This isn’t a common phenomenon in India. In India, there were 144 death sentences awarded in 2021. In Indian cases like Nirbhaya Rape, the court imposed the death penalty for the most
Critical Analysis of KS Puttaswamy Vs Union of India Case– It formally recognized the right to privacy as being a fundamental right recognized under Article 21 right to life and personal liberty. It held that privacy is a natural right that inheres in all natural persons and that the right may be restricted only by
On 31st July 1980, the Hon’ble Supreme court in the matter of Minerva Mills vs Union of India pronounced one of the Landmark judgement in the constitutional history of our country. This judgement not only affirmed the basic structure doctrine but also restored the faith of people in our judiciary. In this judgment, the court
Title- Shreya Singhal Vs. Union of India Date of Judgment: 24 March,2015 Bench: J. Chelameswar, Rohinton Fali Nariman Law Points: Sec 66 A of Information technology, Act Facts Two women named Shaheen Dhada and Rinu Srinivasan were arrested in 2012 in Mumbai when one of them posted a statement criticizing the bandh by Shiv Sena
Title:Â Waman Rao And Ors v. Union Of India And Ors. Citation: 1981 2 SCR 1 Benches: Â Y Chandrachud, A Sen, P Bhagwati, V Tulzapurkar, V K Iyer Law Points:Â Article 31 A and B of the Constitution of India Facts of the case There was an Act called Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings)
Title: Solaman vs Solaman Citation: (1897) AC 22 (1896) UKHL 1 Benches: Lord Halsbury L.C., Lord Watson., Lord Herschell., Lord Macnaghten., Lord Morris., Lord Davey. Law Points:Â Section 6,8,30 and 43 of Companies Act, 1862 Background of the Solaman vs Solaman case Basically, company law is set up on the concept of Separate Legal Personality.
TITLE – Basheshar Nath V. The Commissioner of Income Tax EQUIVALENT CITATION – AIR 2018 SC 357 BENCH – CJI S.R. Das, N.H. Bhagwati, S.K Das, J.L. Kapur, K. Subba Rao  LAW POINT – Section 8A of the taxation of Income (Investigation and Commissioner) Act, 1947 and Article 14 of Constitution of India BACKGROUND The